http://codereview.chromium.org/164399/diff/1/2 File src/x64/disasm-x64.cc (left):
http://codereview.chromium.org/164399/diff/1/2#oldcode108 Line 108: { 0x90, UNSET_OP_ORDER, "nop" }, On 2009/08/12 20:03:37, Erik Corry wrote: > Was this deliberate? Yes. This instruction is handled by code, because one 64-bit case of it is no longer NOP, but xchg rax, r8. http://codereview.chromium.org/164399 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
