On 2014/10/22 14:10:40, rossberg wrote:
On 2014/10/22 14:09:05, titzer wrote:
> On 2014/10/22 14:07:36, rossberg wrote:
> > LGTM. My only concern is that the check indirections make it
impossible to
see
> > the origin of the failure directly, without a (working) stack trace
(at
least
> I
> > have repeatedly been bitten by this annoyance in other places).
>
> I could add more useful V8_Fatal() error messages like:
>
> Error: node #53:Int32Add should have upper bound of Type x.
Yes, that would be great!
Done.
https://codereview.chromium.org/669073002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
