On 2015/02/19 16:26:17, arv wrote:
On 2015/02/19 16:19:41, rossberg wrote:
> On 2015/02/19 16:15:42, marja wrote:
> > On 2015/02/19 13:23:05, rossberg wrote:
> > > Good question. Most existing tests will probably not work, for 'var'
alone.
> > > Maybe it's good enough to have a number of dedicated strong mode
test
> > programs.
> > > If something really gets ruled out accidentally then I suppose we
gonna
find
> > out
> > > relatively quickly...
> >
> > ... how would we find it out though if we only run our small and few
dedicated
> > test progs w/ strong mode, and no other code?
>
> Yeah, I think once we have a critical mass of features, we should port
some
> interesting programs to strong mode as tests. We could also try to run
(the
> strongified version of) Traceur as a test. Arv, is Traceur pure ES6?
Yes. Right now we compile it to ES5 but there is an option to compile it
to
ES6.
We have granular flags for everything and I was planning to start using
io.js
and keep things io.js supports (let, generators, for-of etc).
Okay, what does "compile to ES6" mean in this case? If the Traceur sources
are
pure ES6, could an ES6-ready VM perhaps even run Traceur itself without
bootstrapping through self compilation first?
https://codereview.chromium.org/939063002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.