I talked to Sven about this a bit: He convinced me that the protocol is
actually
fine as it is. Because there are cases where a CODE_REMOVED event cannot be
reconstructed from CODE_ADDED and CODE_MOVED. Imagine an external debugger
that
has a DisassembleAllJittedCode functionality. This one might potentially
look at
released pages without such an event.
The fact that we don't implement all of the protocol (for more than two
years!)
correctly is a different story, but probably still doesn't warrant
restricting
the protocol.
https://codereview.chromium.org/960493003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
