On 2015/02/27 09:48:11, jochen (slow) wrote:
On 2015/02/27 at 09:42:20, dslomov wrote:
> On 2015/02/27 09:21:16, jochen (slow) wrote:
> > (also note that the top-level owner file still overrides everything,
so
even
if
> > we end up with a single person in a subdir, this won't block anybody
when
that
> > person is unavailable)
>
> Sounds like there is a lot of feelings about who owns what on this CL.
> My understanding is OWNERS in subdirs is just an advisory about
suggested
experts in the area (since many people are at loss about who are the right
reviewers), not a blocking "only land after I approve" requirement.
> From comments on this CL, I get a feeling that some people perceive that
differently though - I hope my feeling is off though.
the intend of this CL is to have advisory OWNERS (and that's how the tools
will
handle it)
I get the intent - I just want to make sure that all team members interpret
the
intent correctly.
There are tools but then there's team culture. Being clear on the latter is
more
important than tools.
https://codereview.chromium.org/960903003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
