On 2015/03/26 07:20:33, Sven Panne wrote:
On 2015/03/25 19:32:22, michael_dawson wrote:
> Ok with the latest changes we've removed the excludes from the test
status
files
> so don't have any skips other than regress/regress-1132 which you
indicated
> would be ok.
Nice! And our waterfall columns for PPC now have a tendency to be
green... :-)
> I have a set of small changes to address compilation failures on AIX
due to
> recent changes but after that my plan would be to create the review
which
has
> our optimization which does not depend on any of the existing of the OOL
> code but does require changes in the common code.
Sounds OK, let's see what the changes to the common code are and how they
fit
to
our (vague) constant pool plans.
Regarding this CL at hand: Can we close this? Split this? ...?
I've created https://codereview.chromium.org/1030353003/ with the changes to
enable the constant pool and have added all the reviewers from this
review. I
think
that is the right place to continue the discussion so I'll close this one.
https://codereview.chromium.org/882263003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
