On 2015/03/27 09:16:54, Jakob wrote:
> > well, or it can go on ice for a bit, either way is fine
>
> @jkummerow I'm seeing the same layout test behaviour with a build with
the
patch
> reverted, looks like incorrect baselines or something (in a small % of
tests)...
> so I think this one is pretty low-risk. That said, will wait anyways if
you
> prefer
Right now we're having so much trouble getting our rolls to stick in
Chromium
that I'd indeed prefer if any non-urgent behavior changes could be held
back
at
least over the weekend. At this time, I'd put it as "when you see a
Canary go
out with V8 4.3.60 or later, then you can give this a shot."
+1, let's hold off on anything that we can.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1027283004/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
