On 2015/06/02 at 04:43:02, bmeurer wrote:
On 2015/06/01 15:14:27, jochen wrote:
> wdyt?
>
> the impact on the code is minimal...
As mentioned yesterday: IMHO we will put ourselves in a bad position if
we do
this now. I'd first explore the options that do not involve on-heap typed
arrays
at all.
Well, given that we already have on-heap typed arrays, and that even if we
can
fully escape analyse them, we'll still need to create them in the end, I
don't
think we put ourselves into a worse position.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1144393003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.