https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/diff/40001/test/cctest/test-api.cc
File test/cctest/test-api.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/diff/40001/test/cctest/test-api.cc#newcode21442
test/cctest/test-api.cc:21442: TEST(StrongModeAccessChecks) {
On 2015/06/30 12:38:03, rossberg wrote:
Can we also have a test where the access check forbids the access?
Just to make
sure that still raises the right exception.
Done.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/diff/40001/test/mjsunit/strong/load-proxy.js
File test/mjsunit/strong/load-proxy.js (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/diff/40001/test/mjsunit/strong/load-proxy.js#newcode62
test/mjsunit/strong/load-proxy.js:62:
assertDoesNotThrow(function(){proxy1.foo});
On 2015/06/30 12:38:03, rossberg wrote:
Maybe add an explanatory TODO here that says that this is merely a
sanity test,
and probably not the semantics we ultimately want for proxies.
Done.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
