On 2015/08/24 18:29:50, caitp wrote:
On 2015/08/24 18:17:17, caitp wrote:
> On 2015/08/24 18:14:29, adamk wrote:
> > https://codereview.chromium.org/1307223002/diff/40001/src/ast.h
> > File src/ast.h (right):
> >
> >
https://codereview.chromium.org/1307223002/diff/40001/src/ast.h#newcode1493
> > src/ast.h:1493: return boilerplate_properties_ == 0 &&
properties_->length()
>
> > 0;
> > On 2015/08/24 18:00:53, adamk wrote:
> > > I don't think the LHS of this expression is correct: it only works for
> object
> > > literals whose first property has a computed name. See the way the
> > > number_of_boilerplate_properties is accumulated in ParseObjectLiteral():
it
> > only
> > > stops counting up after it hits the first computed name. I suspect test
> cases
> > > where the first property is non-computed will keep failing with this
patch.
> >
> > Hmm, local testing suggests I'm wrong about this failing, so I'm not
totally
> > sure what's going on.
>
> Out for a bit, but I'll add more tests like this later. My reading of the
parts
> code is that if the has_computed_properties or whatever flag is set, it sets
> boilerplate properties to 0. I'll add more tests in a bit

So you're saying it does fail that way in some cases?

Yes. For example:

out/Release/d8 -e "print(JSON.stringify([{name: 'ivan', [42]: 42 }]))"

still prints:

[{"name":"ivan"}]

with this patch applied.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1307223002/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to