Updates:
        Status: Assigned
        Owner: [email protected]

Comment #3 on issue 4374 by [email protected]: Math.max inside asm.js produces the wrong result with --turbo_inlining
https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=4374

Yes, this is known issue, the C++ fallback implementation if %Arguments and %ArgumentsLength (i.e. implemented in runtime-scopes.cc at the bottom) are not composable with regard to inlining. There are two parts to this problem that needs to be fixed before shipping general-purpose inlining.

1) A certain class of intrinsics can only be lowered after all inlining is finished. So once JSIntrinsicLowering supports %_Arguments and %_ArgumentsLength, it imposes a certain phase ordering on the pipeline. This ordering restriction needs to made obvious, otherwise it will turn into a treasure trove of bugs.

2) The fallback implementations in C++ need to be adapted so that they compose well with respect to inlining. They should both use deoptimization information to reconstruct the original arguments, similar to what Accessors::FunctionGetArguments is doing.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to