Just for clarification: the new callback (the one that takes a 
WeakCallbackInfo) functions as follows:

- is called if registered for every GCed weak object 
- is called at the end of a GC run but before any JS execution happens. 
Especially this one is not clear to me from the documentation. 

Thanks

Dirk

Am Dienstag, 12. April 2016 20:22:25 UTC+2 schrieb Jochen Eisinger:
>
> ok, so the update to NAN 2.0 broke the node-weak module. Using the 
> kParameter weakness type means that the weak callback will come after the 
> object was already GC'd, and it's no longer safe to access the object in 
> the callback.
>
> In fact, the requirement for the callback is that it doesn't invoke any 
> function in the VM but resets the persistent handle. If you need to do any 
> post-processing, you can register a second-pass callback that will be 
> invoked later when it's again safe to call into v8.
>
> If you require the old behavior of getting a pointer to object before it 
> dies, you have to rely on the deprecated SetWeak methods (I guess we should 
> consider undeprecating it...)
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> Evaluating callback on that stack: 0x5a738dc0 
>> {weakref.node!Nan::imp::FunctionCallbackWrapper(const 
>> v8::FunctionCallbackInfo<v8::Value> &)}
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 7:48:11 PM UTC+2, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
>>
>>> What function is "callback" in the HandleApiCallHelper frame pointing to?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, 7:36 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I should have mentioned my original bug report against V8: 
>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=4830
>>>>
>>>> The stacktrace (with node running in debug mode) would be: 
>>>> https://gist.github.com/bpasero/fb5f8a6022b37f7b1a34
>>>>
>>>> I am sitting in the Visual Studio debugger right at the FAIL call and 
>>>> can examine the object. Typing "this" just returns that it is a 
>>>> v8::internal::Object with a value of 0x0baffedf {...}
>>>>
>>>> Btw I am able to run IsOddball() and that returns false.
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 7:31:23 PM UTC+2, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and the value of "this" when you hit the FATAL()
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:33 PM Jochen Eisinger <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Could you post a stack trace that leads to the FATAL()?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:27 PM Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:11 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > we (Microsoft VS Code team) are tracking down a very weird native 
>>>>>>> crash in
>>>>>>> > our use of node.js (5.10.0, V8 46) that only ever shows up since 
>>>>>>> we updated
>>>>>>> > from node.js 4.x (V8 45). It seems that changes (around the Garbace
>>>>>>> > Collector?) in V8 46 have an impact to the crash.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Specifically, we are using the node-weak module
>>>>>>> > (https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-weak) to be able to get weak 
>>>>>>> references
>>>>>>> > onto JavaScript objects. This used to work relatively good in 
>>>>>>> node.js 4.x,
>>>>>>> > but with node.js 5.x we suddenly get the entire node.js program to 
>>>>>>> terminate
>>>>>>> > with a fatal crash.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Today we were finally able to track the location of where the crash
>>>>>>> > originates and it seems to happen when our application simply 
>>>>>>> calls into a
>>>>>>> > property of the object that is weakly referenced. This call at one 
>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>> > reaches the following assertion:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > void Object::VerifyApiCallResultType() {
>>>>>>> > #if DEBUG
>>>>>>> >   if (!(IsSmi() || IsString() || IsSymbol() || IsSpecObject() ||
>>>>>>> >         IsHeapNumber() || IsSimd128Value() || IsUndefined() || 
>>>>>>> IsTrue() ||
>>>>>>> >         IsFalse() || IsNull())) {
>>>>>>> >     FATAL("API call returned invalid object");
>>>>>>> >   }
>>>>>>> > #endif  // DEBUG
>>>>>>> > }
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The process terminates from the FATAL call, as none of the 
>>>>>>> previous checks
>>>>>>> > in this method hold.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Now, the interesting question is: How would it be possible to have 
>>>>>>> a JS
>>>>>>> > object where calling properties on it would fail in such a fatal 
>>>>>>> way? It
>>>>>>> > seems to us that the object we are calling a property on is a 
>>>>>>> pointer to a
>>>>>>> > location in memory where no V8 object exists anymore. It almost 
>>>>>>> seems that
>>>>>>> > the object was garbage collected (or moved to another address?) 
>>>>>>> without the
>>>>>>> > JS side (or more specifically the node-weak side) getting to know.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Since this only reproduces with using node-weak, it seems very 
>>>>>>> likely that
>>>>>>> > there is an issue with either node-weak or NAN. In fact, node-weak 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> > calling into SetWeak()
>>>>>>> > (
>>>>>>> https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-weak/blob/master/src/weakref.cc#L174
>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>> > and relies on the fact that the callback passed in is triggered 
>>>>>>> and maybe
>>>>>>> > this callback is not triggered anymore in a sync fashion but 
>>>>>>> rather async?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I would appreciate some pointers if there is something that could 
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> > probably changed in V8 46 that could have an impact on this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have a simple test case (stress on 'simple'), I'll have a 
>>>>>>> look.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> v8-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "v8-dev" group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> v8-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "v8-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> v8-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "v8-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to