I actually opened this bug earlier today: https
://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=10715
<https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=10715>

I guess my guess was wrong. I'll take a look at that map.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 18:15 'Seth Brenith' via v8-dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Have you gotten any help with this yet? I don't have a full answer for
> you, but I implemented the ability to print out the list of nested Torque
> macros at a failure (CL
> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2303598>), and see
> the following:
>
> abort: CSA_ASSERT failed: Torque assert 'Is<A>(o)' failed
> [src/builtins/cast.tq:622] [../../src/builtins/base.tq:1173]
> [../../src/builtins/finalization-registry.tq:166]
>
> So the UnsafeCast in GetWeakCellMap is the one that's failing:
>
>   return UnsafeCast<Map>(LoadNativeContext(context)
>
>  .elements[NativeContextSlot::WEAK_CELL_MAP_INDEX]);
>
> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 11:21:37 AM UTC-7, Gus Caplan wrote:
>>
>> I took a look around the disassembly. It seems (not 100% sure) like the
>> failure is happening as part of the `new (Pretenured) WeakCell{}` call.
>> Maybe I hooked the map up wrong? Not sure how allocating a T could fail
>> Is<T>().
>> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 9:19:43 AM UTC-5 [email protected]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have two ideas.
>>>
>>> First, the real fix: instead of emitting the current file and line
>>> number in the generated CSA, Torque should emit the entire stack of files
>>> and line numbers for all macros that are currently entered. That way we
>>> wouldn't get a message from just some deeply-nested tiny macro like Is<T>
>>> and wonder what other code was including it. I can add this to the Torque
>>> backlog if it's not already there.
>>>
>>> Second, a possible workaround: assuming that gdb or lldb can at least
>>> tell you the name of the builtin and the current offset within it, you
>>> could try running mksnapshot with all of the normal args plus --print-code
>>> --code-comments, and looking at the disassembly for that builtin near that
>>> offset. Perhaps some nearby strings or code comments might give you a hint
>>> about the context.
>>>
>>> --
> --
> v8-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/v8-dev/YgaFjYulOB8/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-dev/9cc21f3a-2c8a-4891-b2ac-a9f3ef694a08o%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-dev/9cc21f3a-2c8a-4891-b2ac-a9f3ef694a08o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-dev/CAFzB-QPBvV7p42w85xdbiLmJduweNzHdC%3DhRrOKTe_M8cz0Ahw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to