On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:01 AM Michael Lippautz <[email protected]> wrote:
> One caveat: Presumably, this will stay in an internal dependency, so API > types will have to go through std equivalents which sometimes means that > some internal types would not move to absl to avoid conversion. (I still > think this all makes a lot of sense.) > Good point -- I don't think that necessarily has to be the case, we could make Abseil an externally exposed dependency, but I expect we'd anyway rather prefer types that are on the way to standardisation (e.g. optional or string_view), and anyway we tend to avoid even std:: types on the API boundary where possible. -- -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-dev/CAGRskv8Xpws1d4jBOGb6JiUCOhDACYd-j-Xi9wrXD%2BA4UBoUBQ%40mail.gmail.com.
