On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:36 PM Omer Katz (chromium.org) <[email protected]> wrote: > > My personal opinion is that your proposal doesn't make things worse (as > you've also mentioned in the node discussion) but, since percentages can be > converted to MB before reaching V8, I don't see the motivation for adding > this to V8. > I personally disagree with bnoordhuis that V8 is the better place for it and > I think it makes more sense to have it as a wrapper downstream (i.e. in this > case in node).
The downside of doing things downstream is that only node benefits, not other embedders like Chrome or Deno... ...but the counterargument to that is that node will likely do a better job than V8, unless V8 is willing to go all in on cgroups parsing, like OpenJDK. Node gets that for free from libuv. -- -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-dev/CAHQurc-ejataSugnX2O%3D3jjtrtjhEg-7ta34ARApfMh4SEf76w%40mail.gmail.com.
