Thanks a lot, Mads, exactly that. Code already updated and tested :) yours, anton.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, you mean how to declare a runtime function that accepts different > number of arguments? You can define it to accept -1 arguments which > acts as an indication that it can be called with different number of > arguments. > > -- Mads > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote: >> just fyi. declaring minimal number of arguments failed. For now I >> renamed function to CallFunction2, but if there is an easy way out, >> I'd be happy to do it in this cl. Otherwise we might want to support >> it in a separate CL, but it might be too involved, at least for now. >> >> yours, >> anton. >> >> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Fast response in hope you'll answer today. >>> >>> Regarding varagrs for CallFunction. Technically I think I don't need smi as >>> I >>> have args.length(), the problem is how to declare such a function in >>> codegen.h? >>> Do you know for sure? I am going to declare it with minimal possible number >>> of >>> args (2, receiver and func). Any better ideas? >>> >>> @Vitaly: yes, EnsureCompiled is unnecessary, thanks a lot! >>> >>> Removing it and porting to other platforms. Will send next patch for review >>> soon. >>> >>> Thanks for all your comments. >>> >>> http://codereview.chromium.org/1623004/show >>> >> > -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
