Thanks for review, committing.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2124021/diff/2001/3001
File src/arm/stub-cache-arm.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/2124021/diff/2001/3001#newcode787
src/arm/stub-cache-arm.cc:787: // holder haven't changed and thus we can
use cached constant function.
On 2010/05/25 14:07:29, Søren Gjesse wrote:
I am wondering whether this check can be skipped if the interceptor
holder and
the lookup holder are the same, or is that not possible?

That's a good point and it indeed could happen.  Let me address that
with a separate CL.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2124021/show

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to