http://codereview.chromium.org/3008017/diff/10001/11003
File src/x64/codegen-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/3008017/diff/10001/11003#newcode8029
src/x64/codegen-x64.cc:8029: __ Move(kScratchRegister,
Factory::null_value());
On 2010/07/21 16:06:45, William Hesse wrote:
Should you avoid using __ between patch_site and moving the map to
kScratchRegister?

I probably should. I don't think the code coverage support is working at
the moment but no reason to break it on purpose. :)

Thanks. Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/3008017/diff/10001/11004
File src/x64/ic-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/3008017/diff/10001/11004#newcode1756
src/x64/ic-x64.cc:1756: int encoded_offsets =
*reinterpret_cast<int*>(encoded_offsets_address);
On 2010/07/21 16:06:45, William Hesse wrote:
Should you use int32_t here?  We have never asserted that int is 32
bits, I
think.

There is a lot of code that uses the knowledge that int is 32-bit on x64
already. This is following the style used in the rest of the patching
code.

http://codereview.chromium.org/3008017/show

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to