>From the right address. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote: > The strange thing is v8 has its own perf monitoring infrastructure > which didn't notice any regression. And v8 gets pushed to trunk---the > version which all other builders should use---quite regularly (~two > times a week). > > Technically v8 perf monitoring is on Linux while build bots are on Windows. > > Anyway, I'll check if I can repro it on my win box. > > yours, > anton. > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> wrote: >> +CC v8-dev >> V8 team, are you aware of the issue below? >> PK >> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Carlos Pizano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> just surprised that is 4 weeks old and nobody complaining >>> >>> On Jul 27, 1:37 pm, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Looks like it's only a regression on the v8-latest bots. So, it seems >>> > like a >>> > v8 regression that hasn't been rolled into the Chromium tree. >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Carlos Pizano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > >http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/xp-release-v8-latest/sunspider/report.html?history=150&rev=-1 >>> > >>> > > Looking at the chromium-dev traffic I don't see any mention of this. >>> > > Nor a bug. >> >> -- >> Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] >> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >> http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev >> >
-- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
