http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/2
File src/compiler.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/2#newcode280
src/compiler.cc:280: // TODO(lrn): Maybe *only* collect function info,
not symbol info, in
So, this is now done. Should you remove the FLAG_lazy part of the
conjunction? At least you should update the comment.

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/3
File src/parser.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/3#newcode968
src/parser.cc:968: protected:
Could you leave a blank line before protected?

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/3#newcode1290
src/parser.cc:1290: class InlinePreParser : public PreParser {
I don't like the name. What is inline about it? Can we call it
PartialPreParser to match the CompletePreParser name above?

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/3#newcode5476
src/parser.cc:5476: ScriptDataImpl* PreParseInline(Handle<String>
source,
Again, I would prefer a different name.

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/4
File src/parser.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/diff/1/4#newcode223
src/parser.h:223: unibrow::CharacterStream* stream,
Funky indentation.

http://codereview.chromium.org/3356010/show

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to