http://codereview.chromium.org/3566003/diff/5001/6001
File src/compiler.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/3566003/diff/5001/6001#newcode184
src/compiler.cc:184: info.set_function(lit);
On 2010/09/30 08:41:49, Søren Gjesse wrote:
Why not pass the function literal to the EagerCompilationInfo
constructor? It
seems to always set when constructing an EagerCompilationInfo anyway.

I plan to refactor the parser entry points to take the CompilationInfo
and fill in its FunctionLiteral.

http://codereview.chromium.org/3566003/show

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to