http://codereview.chromium.org/5122005/diff/11001/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc
File src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/5122005/diff/11001/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc#newcode6703
src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc:6703: __ mov(array_length, scratch);
But they are not equivalent. I was about to suggest that you used
array_length in the calculations above, instead of using scratch and
then moving scratch to array_length ... until I realized that
array_length was an Operand.

Reading what's written doesn't need distinguishing, but understanding
why it's written as it is, does.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5122005/diff/11001/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc#newcode6769
src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc:6769: __ jmp(&copy_loop_1_entry);
You wouldn't need the entry label then, so the label count is the same.
Go for optimal! Great isn't good enough! :)

http://codereview.chromium.org/5122005/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to