So, since flags can be true by default, rather than a --disable-strict-mode
flag, which is false by default, we should
just have a --strict-mode flag, which is true by default.  Right?  Would
there also be a --always-strict-mode flag?



On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to clearify. Having a flag to disable which is enabled by default is a
> bit confusing. ;) We want strict-mode support on by default! The flag can be
> used to test if pages break because of strict mode or something else.
>
> Thanks!    -- Mads
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:29 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> After some thought, we think it will be a good idea to have a flag that
>> can be
>> used to disable strict mode detection.
>> It should be enabled by default, but the flag will let us test whether
>> it's
>> strict-mode that makes something fail.
>>
>> It should be sufficient to check it only at the point where we set strict
>> mode
>> to true, and just do nothing - that would automatically make everything
>> non-strict.
>>
>>
>> http://codereview.chromium.org/6144005/
>>
>
>  --
> v8-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>



-- 
William Hesse
Software Engineer
[email protected]

Google Denmark ApS
Frederiksborggade 20B, 1 sal
1360 København K
Denmark
CVR nr. 28 86 69 84

If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to
anyone else (it may contain confidential or privileged information), please
erase all copies of it, including all attachments, and please let the sender
know it went to the wrong person. Thanks.

-- 
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to