LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/code-stubs-x64.cc
File src/x64/code-stubs-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/code-stubs-x64.cc#newcode3464
src/x64/code-stubs-x64.cc:3464: // None of the flags is supported on
X64.
is -> are

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/lithium-codegen-x64.cc
File src/x64/lithium-codegen-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/lithium-codegen-x64.cc#newcode1607
src/x64/lithium-codegen-x64.cc:1607: NearLabel true_value, done;
Maybe put labels above the testq minimize diff to ia32

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/lithium-codegen-x64.cc#newcode1664
src/x64/lithium-codegen-x64.cc:1664: // Here result has either true or
false. Deferred code also produces true or
it never has true here does it?

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/lithium-x64.cc
File src/x64/lithium-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/diff/3001/src/x64/lithium-x64.cc#newcode1085
src/x64/lithium-x64.cc:1085: UseFixed(instance_of->right()), rdx);
is the parenthesis not in the wrong place above? rdx is the fixed
register we should use right? Does this even compile?

http://codereview.chromium.org/6529024/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to