I think I would prefer Vitaly's AddImplicitReferences. That is also the exact words used in the description of the API.
Just my two cents. :-) -- Mads On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Mikhail Naganov <[email protected]>wrote: > How about `AddImplicitRelation' or `AddImplicitConnection' ? As > connections can be one-to-many it's OK to use a singular form. > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 23:05, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Vitaly Repeshko <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Anton Muhin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> I am not sure it's that different---the whole group of objects > >>> survives if some condition is held. For object groups: any object is > >>> alive, for implicit references---designated object is alive. For me > >>> they are similar enough. YMMV of course. > >> > >> You see? You don't use the word "group" yourself in the second case :) > >> I'm for preventing any confusion that an embedder might have here. > > > > That was just an omission---I like shorter sentences :) > > > > In any event, I already told that I am fine with switch to references. > > I just hope there might be better variants. > > > > yours, > > anton. > > > -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
