Thank you for the suggestion Jacob. I will formulate my proposal after doing a bit more research and according to your guidelines. I will also start a new thread as not to confuse the reader.
This should all take place in a day or so as I prepare the submission. Thanks again! Hayao On Jul 22, 5:19 am, Jakob Kummerow <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't you begin by describing your idea? It's totally fine if this is in > high-level English; assembly code isn't the language of choice for > discussing algorithm ideas anyway. > > Hints for being taken seriously: > - be precise > - be concise > - get at least a basic understanding of how V8 works today (it does generate > native assembly code, you know), then describe how your idea would integrate > into that. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:24 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > Recently whilst plodding through the exercise of implementing a > > primitive bytecode and javascript interpreter, I stumbled upon an idea > > for an optimization to potentially take the execution speed of a > > javascript engine like V8 into the realm of native code (despite its > > dynamic nature) and would greatly like to share it. > > > My issue is that I lack the experience to articulate the concept in > > assembly code (proof of concept), and would like to know how best to > > present it to give it the best chance of being understood and most > > importantly, to be taken seriously. > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > -- > > v8-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > >http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
