[v8-dev] Re: Force lazy deoptimization and remove optimized code on deopt inside a recursively invoked function. (issue 7890028)

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:10:32 -0700

I don't understand why this was a RUNTIME_ASSERT before. Søren, do you remember 
why that was?

Otherwise, LGTM.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7890028/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to