LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/7837028/diff/6017/src/parser.cc
File src/parser.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7837028/diff/6017/src/parser.cc#newcode2437
src/parser.cc:2437: // TODO(keuchel): move temporary variable to block
scope
What does this mean? Is the current code not correct, or is this just an
optimization?
(and remember '.' at end of sentences :).

http://codereview.chromium.org/7837028/diff/6017/test/mjsunit/harmony/block-for.js
File test/mjsunit/harmony/block-for.js (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7837028/diff/6017/test/mjsunit/harmony/block-for.js#newcode36
test/mjsunit/harmony/block-for.js:36: assertEquals(0, props({}).length,
"olen0");
You can safely choose to omit the third parameter of the test without
loss since our test framework reports the line now.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7837028/diff/6017/test/mjsunit/harmony/block-for.js#newcode54
test/mjsunit/harmony/block-for.js:54: for (let i = 0x0020; i < 0x01ff;
i+=2) {
Try declaring i and s prior to this loop, and see that their values
haven't changed afterwards.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7837028/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to