Comment #1 on issue 1795 by [email protected]: Test-case demonstrating 9x degradation since 3.1
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1795
Correction: it was not r4783, it was r7283Suggestion: instead of reverting r7283 we can limit optimization introduced in it to toplevel code.
-- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
