Revision: 10847
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     Mon Feb 27 23:16:50 2012
Log:      Handle CALLBACKS correctly in IsProperty functions.

With transitions in AccessorPairs, it is not enough to look at the PropertyType
alone to decide whether we look at a property or not: For objects with
JavaScript accessors, we have to look into the AccessorPair itself and see if
one of its 2 parts is actually a JavaScript accessor. Therefore, a predicate
with a PropertyType argument alone doesn't make sense anymore, we might need the
associated value, too.

Things are complicated by the fact that the holder in a LookupResult can be
NULL, so we must be careful to retrieve its value only when it is really
needed. To achieve the needed call-by-name semantics, a new Entry is introduced, which is basically a closure over a DescriptorArray and an index into this array (C++0x to the rescue!). GCC is clever enough to inline this class, so we pay no
runtime penalty for this abstraction.

It's all a bit ugly, but this is caused by the current structure of Descriptor, DescriptorArray and LookupResult: Things would be much easier if DescriptorArray were, well, an array of Descriptors, and LookupResult were a 'Maybe Descriptor'
(in Haskell-terms).

Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9466047
http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=10847

Modified:
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/objects-inl.h
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/objects.h
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/property-details.h
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/property.h

=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/objects-inl.h   Sun Feb 26 23:49:14 2012
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/objects-inl.h   Mon Feb 27 23:16:50 2012
@@ -1988,7 +1988,8 @@


 bool DescriptorArray::IsProperty(int descriptor_number) {
-  return IsRealProperty(GetType(descriptor_number));
+  Entry entry(this, descriptor_number);
+  return IsPropertyDescriptor(&entry);
 }


=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/objects.h       Sun Feb 26 23:49:14 2012
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/objects.h       Mon Feb 27 23:16:50 2012
@@ -2589,6 +2589,20 @@
   static const int kMaxNumberOfDescriptors = 1024 + 512;

  private:
+  // An entry in a DescriptorArray, represented as an (array, index) pair.
+  class Entry {
+   public:
+    inline explicit Entry(DescriptorArray* descs, int index) :
+        descs_(descs), index_(index) { }
+
+    inline PropertyType type() { return descs_->GetType(index_); }
+    inline Object* GetCallbackObject() { return descs_->GetValue(index_); }
+
+   private:
+    DescriptorArray* descs_;
+    int index_;
+  };
+
   // Conversion from descriptor number to array indices.
   static int ToKeyIndex(int descriptor_number) {
     return descriptor_number+kFirstIndex;
@@ -7918,6 +7932,10 @@
       set_setter(value);
     }
   }
+
+  bool ContainsAccessor() {
+    return IsJSAccessor(getter()) || IsJSAccessor(setter());
+  }

 #ifdef OBJECT_PRINT
   void AccessorPairPrint(FILE* out = stdout);
@@ -7931,6 +7949,15 @@
   static const int kSize = kSetterOffset + kPointerSize;

  private:
+ // Strangely enough, in addition to functions and harmony proxies, the spec
+  // requires us to consider undefined as a kind of accessor, too:
+  //    var obj = {};
+  //    Object.defineProperty(obj, "foo", {get: undefined});
+  //    assertTrue("foo" in obj);
+  bool IsJSAccessor(Object* obj) {
+    return obj->IsSpecFunction() || obj->IsUndefined();
+  }
+
   DISALLOW_IMPLICIT_CONSTRUCTORS(AccessorPair);
 };

=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/property-details.h      Mon Feb  6 04:11:40 2012
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/property-details.h      Mon Feb 27 23:16:50 2012
@@ -73,26 +73,6 @@
 };


-inline bool IsRealProperty(PropertyType type) {
-  switch (type) {
-    case NORMAL:
-    case FIELD:
-    case CONSTANT_FUNCTION:
-    case CALLBACKS:
-    case HANDLER:
-    case INTERCEPTOR:
-      return true;
-    case MAP_TRANSITION:
-    case ELEMENTS_TRANSITION:
-    case CONSTANT_TRANSITION:
-    case NULL_DESCRIPTOR:
-      return false;
-  }
-  UNREACHABLE();  // keep the compiler happy
-  return false;
-}
-
-
 // PropertyDetails captures type and attributes for a property.
 // They are used both in property dictionaries and instance descriptors.
 class PropertyDetails BASE_EMBEDDED {
=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/property.h      Mon Feb  6 04:11:40 2012
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/property.h      Mon Feb 27 23:16:50 2012
@@ -162,6 +162,35 @@
                       int index = 0)
       : Descriptor(key, foreign, attributes, CALLBACKS, index) {}
 };
+
+
+template <class T>
+bool IsPropertyDescriptor(T* desc) {
+  switch (desc->type()) {
+    case NORMAL:
+    case FIELD:
+    case CONSTANT_FUNCTION:
+    case HANDLER:
+    case INTERCEPTOR:
+      return true;
+    case CALLBACKS: {
+      Object* callback_object = desc->GetCallbackObject();
+ // Non-JavaScript (i.e. native) accessors are always a property, otherwise + // either the getter or the setter must be an accessor. Put another way:
+      // If we only see map transitions and holes in a pair, this is not a
+      // property.
+      return (!callback_object->IsAccessorPair() ||
+              AccessorPair::cast(callback_object)->ContainsAccessor());
+    }
+    case MAP_TRANSITION:
+    case ELEMENTS_TRANSITION:
+    case CONSTANT_TRANSITION:
+    case NULL_DESCRIPTOR:
+      return false;
+  }
+  UNREACHABLE();  // keep the compiler happy
+  return false;
+}


 class LookupResult BASE_EMBEDDED {
@@ -261,10 +290,9 @@
   bool IsFound() { return lookup_type_ != NOT_FOUND; }
   bool IsHandler() { return lookup_type_ == HANDLER_TYPE; }

-  // Is the result is a property excluding transitions and the null
-  // descriptor?
+ // Is the result is a property excluding transitions and the null descriptor?
   bool IsProperty() {
-    return IsFound() && IsRealProperty(GetPropertyDetails().type());
+    return IsFound() && IsPropertyDescriptor(this);
   }

   bool IsCacheable() { return cacheable_; }

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to