On 2012/07/26 13:20:43, Vyacheslav Egorov (Google) wrote:
DBQ: is there any reason why we decided not to compact it even more by not
allocating backing store at all if we have only hash hidden property...
Smth
like:
if hidden_properties->IsNumber() then hidden_properties represents hash
otherwise it represents a hidden properties backing store.
That sounds like a good idea, for the special case of identity hashes. I'll
explore that.
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10824042/
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
