On 2013/06/24 15:14:16, Vyacheslav Egorov (Google) wrote:
DBC: Smi on x64 is a Signed32. How does it fit with naming?
That's the point of the Integer31 -> Smi renaming. The idea is that "Smi" is
platform agnostic, it just means "whatever can be stored as a Smi on this
platform". It should play well with existing code.
(See my comment that the relation is really "Smi <= Signed32".)
https://codereview.chromium.org/17589013/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
