https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.cc
File src/code-stubs.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.cc#newcode49
src/code-stubs.cc:49: miss_handler_(),
On 2013/09/02 12:40:52, Sven Panne wrote:
Is this change intentional? I can't easily see why it's
correct/needed...
yes, intentional. all accesses to miss_handler are checked to ensure
they were set in the first place, so NULL here is okay
https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.h
File src/code-stubs.h (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/diff/1/src/code-stubs.h#newcode280
src/code-stubs.h:280: explicit CodeStubInterfaceDescriptor();
On 2013/09/02 12:40:52, Sven Panne wrote:
Huh?
will fix
https://codereview.chromium.org/23729006/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
