Would it be possible to use movp rather than MoveReturnAddress, and keep
movq
rather than introducing MoveInteger64? Movp would just mov a
platform-specific
pointer-sized value, while movq and movl would do what the name indicates.
If there's no other reason you introduced those specific Move* functions,
I'd
prefer to not overspecify the intent. Otherwise we end up with lots of
specific
macro instructions that add more noise than value.
https://codereview.chromium.org/64313002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
