Thanks!
https://codereview.chromium.org/148913008/diff/1/src/a64/cpu-a64.cc
File src/a64/cpu-a64.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/148913008/diff/1/src/a64/cpu-a64.cc#newcode29
src/a64/cpu-a64.cc:29: #ifdef __aarch64__
On 2014/01/30 11:17:15, Rodolph Perfetta (ARM) wrote:
The current port does not use syscall for cache flushing as aarch64
allows it to
be perform in user space. We may consider syscall for some cases in
the future
as superuser instructions provide finer control.
Done.
https://codereview.chromium.org/148913008/diff/1/src/platform-linux.cc
File src/platform-linux.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/148913008/diff/1/src/platform-linux.cc#newcode446
src/platform-linux.cc:446: #elif defined(__aarch64__)
On 2014/01/30 11:17:15, Rodolph Perfetta (ARM) wrote:
there is already a __aarch64__ case 2 lines up, but brk is probably a
better
choice.
Ahh, missed the previous one. Removed it and kept this one.
https://codereview.chromium.org/148913008/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
