https://codereview.chromium.org/139653003/diff/1/src/ia32/full-codegen-ia32.cc
File src/ia32/full-codegen-ia32.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/139653003/diff/1/src/ia32/full-codegen-ia32.cc#newcode1972
src/ia32/full-codegen-ia32.cc:1972: __ bind(&resume);
Instead of storing the initial suspend offset in the generator object,
could we not insert code at the resume point of the initial yield that
throws unless the "next" value is undefined? That would save a word in
each generator object.
WDYT?
https://codereview.chromium.org/139653003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
