https://codereview.chromium.org/200473003/diff/1/test/cctest/test-parsing.cc
File test/cctest/test-parsing.cc (left):

https://codereview.chromium.org/200473003/diff/1/test/cctest/test-parsing.cc#oldcode2221
test/cctest/test-parsing.cc:2221: "new foo++",
On 2014/03/17 09:28:17, Michael Starzinger wrote:
IIUC, this should throw an "invalid LHS" reference error now. Can we
move it
into the ErrorsNewExpression test case? I assume the reason for
removing it was
that parser and pre-parser don't agree (yet). In this case I would
propose
leaving a TODO to add that test again once they do.

Done.

https://codereview.chromium.org/200473003/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to