On 2014/04/25 09:08:18, ulan wrote:
https://codereview.chromium.org/253513003/diff/1/src/arm64/lithium-codegen-arm64.cc
File src/arm64/lithium-codegen-arm64.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/253513003/diff/1/src/arm64/lithium-codegen-arm64.cc#newcode1239
src/arm64/lithium-codegen-arm64.cc:1239: return (signedness ==
SIGNED_INT32) ?
value : value & kWRegMask;
This will now generate 64-bit RelocInfo. Is this intended?
No, it wasn't! I don't think there's any difference between NONE32 and
NONE64
for arm64, but I'll fix it anyway.
https://codereview.chromium.org/253513003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
