On Feb 26, 8:53 pm, Joe Antoon <[email protected]> wrote:
> binds function instances to
> it.http://www.betterwebber.com/stuff/v8/importex.cchttp://www.betterwebber.com/stuff/v8/pluginex.cc
Great! It looks like you've done all the work already! :)
> That's pretty simplistic, but it's worked so far for what I've been
> doing (shell with MPI bindings). What OO approach do you have in
> mind?
i don't have a strong preference, actually. In my existing
(SpiderMonkey-based) code i use dll_load(). Maybe something like:
system.plugins.open("foo");
system.plugins.classpath.set( dir1, dir2, ... );
system.plugins.classpath.set( [dir1,dir2,...,dirN] );
var myArray = system.plugins.classpath.asArray();
etc. But the public API doesn't need more than 3 functions in my
experience (set/get classpath and open dll), so global-scope functions
are arguably just as appropriate.
i'm headed off to bed, but i'll take a close look at your plugins code
over the weekend :). Thanks for sharing!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
