Stephan, or somoeone else, could you send me the latest compiled lib? I do not find the instructions to get it to a reasonable size and really do not have much energy to get deeper into this issue.
Thank you. On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:02 AM, ionlupascu <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, > > I compiled v8 and v8.lib file is 93.7Mb. It is too large. > > Compilation option is: > scons env="INCLUDE:C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows > \v6.1\Include;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC > \include,LIB:C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\Lib;C: > \Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\lib" > > On 5 янв, 02:55, Philippe Roy <[email protected]> wrote: >> Guys, >> >> Could any of you give me the scons command to execute to get my >> compile going with Visual Studio 2008? >> >> The command that I have used is: >> >> cons env="PATH:C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio >> 9.0\VC\bin;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio >> 9.0\Common7\IDE;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio >> 9.0\Common7\Tools,INCLUDE:C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio >> 9.0\VC\include;C:\Program Files\Microsoft >> SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Include,LIB:C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual >> Studio 9.0\VC\lib;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Lib" >> >> That gets it to compile and as stated in this thread the file >> generated is way too large. I assume the way to get a smaller file is >> not to compile it as a shared library... But I could still compile a >> lib that is of more reasonable size. >> >> I have looked around for the scons instructions but failed so far. >> Your help is welcome. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Philippe Roy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > You guys are absolutely right... There was a memory leak there and it >> > is not clean to do so. I have fixed it. >> >> > Rest assure that I appreciate any constructive feedback such as the >> > ones that were communicated so far. >> >> > I will dig to see how scons work so that I could get my lib to a >> > reasonable size. If anyone has a specific posting that could easily be >> > referred, I would appreciate the input. I will try to find it on my >> > own in the meantime. >> >> > BTW, serious documentation should be made for a novice, such as >> > myself, and include these important details. It's a downer to have to >> > dig for basic information and to have to become an expert just to be a >> > user (I know that is part of the UNIX philosophy that everyone should >> > be an expert)... >> >> > Thank you >> >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Abdulla Kamar <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> I believe that's throw by value, catch by reference. I don't remember it >> >> ever being const reference. Having said that, it looks like Philippe is >> >> coming from a Java or C# background, so it's an understandable mistake. >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>>> PS: if you're really throwing exceptions by pointer, instead of const >> >>>> reference, you REALLY should pick up a copy of Scott Meyers' "Effective >> >>>> C++". >> >> >>> Sorry, that's covered in "More Effective C++", not "Effective C++", Item >> >>> #13. >> >>> -- >> >>> ----- stephan beal >> >>>http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ >> >> >>> -- >> >>> v8-users mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users >> >> >> -- >> >> Thank you >> >> Abdulla >> >> >> -- >> >> v8-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > > -- > v8-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users >
-- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
