On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Matthias Ernst <[email protected]>wrote:
> Some more discussion here: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users/browse_thread/thread/cbaa207e92644ce1/dd3b5909be743457 > >From that thread: On Feb 19 2009, 11:22 am, Ondrej Zara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Having a HandleScope in a function called should be the general rule as > > otherwise all handles created will get "stuck" in some outer HandleScope > > causing them to stay alive longer than expected. > > But this is only true for non-callback functions, because those > specified as argument to FunctionTemplate receive a handle scope > automatically, correct? What exactly is the definition of "callback" here? i understand it to mean v8::InvocableCallback and property accessors/mutators (i.e., anything the client can bind to v8 which v8 will in turn call). Is that a reasonable definition, or am i way off? -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users To unsubscribe from this group, send email to v8-users+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
