On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Mihai Parparita <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote: >> It should be fairly simple to add if you want to give it a >> shot. Otherwise, please file a V8 bug and we will put it in the queue >> of things to add. > > Thanks. I've filed http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=852. > > I can look into adding it myself, do you have any pointers to similar > changes? Does it make sense to expose all of JSRegExp?
Thanks for filing the bug report. I think you should expose only what you need in the beginning and we can evolve the API from there. I would create a new RegExp subclass of Object in include/v8.h following the style for the other classes. I think GetPattern(), GetFlags(), New(pattern, flags) and a cast method would be a good start. Cheers, -- Mads -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
