Cool stuff. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Mikhail Naganov <[email protected]>wrote:
> Looks like a reasonable feature request! Added: > http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=885 > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 16:52, oliverbock <[email protected]> wrote: > > v8 has separate Visual Studio project files for win32 builds, x64 > > builds and ARM (for mobiles, I suppose). Because project files cannot > > be conditionally excluded from a build (so far as I can tell), this > > means we also need a separate .sln file for each architecture, and > > furthermore we cannot use batch build to simultaneously build both > > win32 and x64. > > > > I suggest that instead we have just a single v8.vcproj (and > > v8_base.vcproj, etc), which supports multiple builds and only includes > > architecture-specific files as appropriate. This would reduce the > > number of project files, and stop them becoming hopelessly out of sync > > (on the main trunk, v8_base.vcproj is works, but v8_base_x64.vcproj > > will not build because it has not been updated as files have been > > added and removed). > > > > Does this seem reasonable? > > > > (My apologies if this belongs on v8-dev, but that looked more like a > > Subversion log than a mailing list.) > > > > -- > > v8-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > > > > -- > v8-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
