Hi James,

does vu8 fulfill all the requirements I wrote in my last reply to
Stephan?

Can you (briefly) compare and contrast vu8's strengths and weaknesses
compared to v8-juice (e.g. lightweight is GOOD for my use-case).

Do you have a simple hello-world example w/ build instructions that
works on generic linux OSes, so I can do a quick evaluation?

thanks,
 Jak

On Jan 17, 7:52 am, James Pike <[email protected]> wrote:
> I like my version better than v8-juice. Takes advantage of boost to make the
> code neater and uses function pointer style template arguments to make the
> binding code smaller:
>
> https://github.com/tsa/vu8
>
> Cheers, James
>
> On 16 January 2011 14:12, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jak Sprats <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Does V8 embedding have something like this, so not only a way to call
> >> Javascript from C, but also a way to call C from Javacript?
>
> > There is, but only if you use C++ glue to bind your C API to v8's C++ API,
> > which in turn binds to JS space.
>
> > If i may be so bold as to toot my own horn for a moment, i believe i've
> > implemented the world's simplest-to-use binding mechanism for wrapping C
> > functions (from C++) in v8. Here's an example of all the code one needs to
> > bind sleep() to v8:
>
> > jsObj->Set( String::New("sleep"), FunctionTemplate::New(
> >       convert::FunctionForwarder<1>::Invocable<unsigned int,unsigned
> > int,::sleep>
> >     )->GetFunction() );
>
> > About 50% of that code is required by v8 (i.e. unavoidable, regardless of
> > the wrapping framework) and the other 50% is invoking one of my templates
> > which creates a new v8::InvocationCallback function (with compile-time type
> > safety and no dynamic memory costs) which acts a proxy for sleep().
>
> > More on this topic can be found here:
>
> >http://code.google.com/p/v8-juice/wiki/BindingFunctions
>
> > --
> > ----- stephan beal
> >http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
>
> >  --
> > v8-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users

-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users

Reply via email to