Actually CCing Michael and Andreas. -- Vyacheslav Egorov On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Vyacheslav Egorov <[email protected]> wrote: > +mstarzinger +rossberg > > I think we need a repro and V8 version. I could not repro on ToT with > an example like: > > static Handle<Value> Getter(Local<String> property, const AccessorInfo& > info) { > return Integer::New(24); > } > > > static Handle<Value> Foo(const Arguments& args) { > HandleScope scope; > Handle<Object> obj = Object::New(); > > obj->SetAccessor(String::New("foo"), &Getter, 0 /* setter */, > Handle<Value>(), > static_cast<v8::AccessControl>(v8::DEFAULT), > static_cast<v8::PropertyAttribute>(v8::ReadOnly)); > > return scope.Close(obj); > } > > var obj = Foo(); > > var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(obj, "foo"); > > print(desc.value); > print(desc.get); > print(desc.set); > print(desc.writable); > print(obj.foo); > obj.foo = 42; > print(obj.foo); > > % out/ia32.debug/d8 test.js > 24 > undefined > undefined > false > 24 > 24 > >> What I want is a property that is writable but if not set should call the >> getter. > > I don't see how it fits into JavaScript object model. If you have an > accessor property without a setter you can't write into it ([[CanPut]] > will be false). > >> Is there a way to remove a V8 accessor? > > delete object.name would delete it. But there seems to be a different > way, see below. > >> Would a call to Delete() make this a slow object? > > Yes. > > Different way is to use v8::Object::ForceSet to replace accessor with > a real property. Good news: it will keep an object in fast mode if > possible (if object has enough space for another fast property). Bad > news: every time you replace an accessor with a normal data property > with ForceSet you will get a different map (hidden class) because > v8::internal::JSObject::ConvertDescriptorToField does not create a > transition. > > // In theory accessor descriptors should be replaceable with data > descriptors via [[DefineOwnProperty]] (Object.defineProperty) but > there is some special handling in our code that prevents it. > https://github.com/v8/v8/blob/master/src/runtime.cc#L4459-4478 > > -- > Vyacheslav Egorov > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> The V8 WebKit bindings generates something like this: >> >> object->SetAccessor(name, getter, 0 /* setter */, data, >> static_cast<v8::AccessControl>(v8::DEFAULT), >> static_cast<v8::PropertyAttribute>(v8::ReadOnly) >> >> There are two really strange behaviors with this: >> >> 1. The descriptor for this reports this as writable: >> >> var descr = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, name); >> descr.writable // true! >> >> 2. Setting the property works >> >> object.name = 42; >> object.name // 42 >> >> However, if we remove the ReadOnly flag in the call to SetAccessor we >> get a writable property that cannot be written to: >> >> object->SetAccessor(name, getter, 0 /* setter */, data, >> static_cast<v8::AccessControl>(v8::DEFAULT), >> static_cast<v8::PropertyAttribute>(v8::None) >> >> var descr = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(object, name); >> descr.writable // true >> >> object.name = 42; >> object.name // not 42! >> >> >> This is pretty strange. What I want is a property that is writable but >> if not set should call the getter. >> >> One way I can implement this is to generate a setter too that when set >> reconfigures the property. Is there a way to remove a V8 accessor? >> Would a call to Delete() make this a slow object? >> >> >> -- >> erik >> >> -- >> v8-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
-- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
