Andy,

Lack of deforestation is not really *the* main issue in this particular
example.

If you try fastMap that I attached then you'll see that its overhead is at
least 80% less.

Vyacheslav Egorov


On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Andrii Melnykov <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Monday, February 4, 2013 5:14:05 PM UTC+2, Sven Panne wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Andrii Melnykov <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> http://hpaste.org/81784 contains a benchmark - slow_test() is twice as
>>> slow as fast_test() [...]
>>>
>>
>> Furthermore, we don't do any deforestation, which is "a bit" hard in
>> JavaScript.
>>
>
> It's all I wanted to hear, great answer. It's apparent lack of
> deforestation that worried me. If deforestation is not attempted at all,
> then no need to report specific cases :)
>
> Andy
>
> --
> --
> v8-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "v8-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to