ops, left off my question All of these appear to have some pros and cons, Does anyone have a suggestion of which option is better?
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 5:40:49 PM UTC-4, norm rubin wrote: > > I'm working out how to add some amount of gpu support to javascript, > ideally this would work in the browser (chrome) > to get the gpu to execute I need to do some analysis on the ast, to > generate some gpu code, and to call a c interface to put the code into > execution > A lot of the analysis I need is already in v8 but not exposed as an > interface > > As I understand it, I could do one of the following: > 1) modify v8, and build a special version of chromium > > 2) not modify v8 at all (write code to generate the ast, do the analysis > and code generation in javascript) and use npapi to call the c code > 3) write an extension in which has its own embedded copy of my modified > v8) > 4) some other scheme that I don't know about > > > > > -- -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
