Exciting, and the spec is indeed quite stable. What are your conformance and performance testing plans?
Kind regards, Dmitry On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Adrian Perez de Castro <[email protected]>wrote: > > # TC39 acceptance > > The arrow function syntax proposal has been accepted to be part > of ES6, and it has been in the ES6 draft specs since May 2012 > <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:arrow_function_syntax> > > There has been discussion in es-discuss and TC39 meetings about > arrow-functions and how they interact with the rest of the semantics > of the language, and apart from minor clarifications the proposal has > remained stable along the time. It is very unlikely that the spec for > arrow functions would change in significative ways. > > > # Interest from other vendors > > Firefox/SpiderMonkey already implements arrrow functions since version 22 > < > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/arrow_functions > > > > > # Technical considerations > > Implementing arrow function would have a small impact in V8: most > changes fall in the parser/lexer; the existing representation for > functions would be reused with minor changes. > > > # Implementation/testing > > This patch implements parsing of arrow functions under the > `--harmony_arrow_functions` flag and an unit test for valid > syntax: <https://codereview.chromium.org/160073006/>. After this, > patches would be needed to implement correct scoping of “this”, > “super” and “arguments” in arrow functions (I am working on > those already). > > > -Adrian > -- -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
