May I know what would be the svn repository branch version for this?

On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:40:56 AM UTC-7, Sven Panne wrote:
>
> With the Chrome 34 stable release not too far in the future and the branch 
> for 35 already looming, it is a good time to give a small overview of the 
> recent and upcoming v8 API changes:
>
>    * In the 34 branch, we removed basically all previously deprecated 
> things to wipe the slate clean.
>
>    * The following functions require an Isolate* as the first argument 
> now: ObjectTemplate::New, FunctionTemplate::New, Object::New, Integer::New, 
> Integer::NewUnsigned, String::Empty, HandleScope::NumberOfHandles.
>
>    * A few tweaks were made to the CpuProfiler API, so the following 
> methods are gone/replaced by new counterparts: CpuProfile::GetUid, 
> CpuProfiler::GetProfileCount, CpuProfiler::GetCpuProfile, 
> CpuProfiler::DeleteAllCpuProfiles.
>
>    * We totally removed AssertNoGCScope, it was not instantiable at all.
>
>    * The ExternalArrayType enum gets more spec-conformant constant names, 
> but the previous ones are still available for some time to ease the 
> transition.
>
>    * The (pre)compilation API will change a bit in the 35 branch, because 
> the previous one was too confusing: When you had a Script, it was totally 
> unclear if it was bound to a context or not. We now cleanly distinguish 
> these via Script (= context-bound) and ContextUnboundScript. You have to 
> use BindToCurrentContext to convert the latter into the former to run it. 
> The API in this area has a few more tweaks to prepare for better caching of 
> (pre)compilation results in the future.
>
> We will continue to improve the whole API, especially regarding the 
> confusing notions of "default Isolate" and "current Isolate". In the 
> future, as a rule of thumb, an embedder should be prepared to have an 
> explicit Isolate at hand when one is needed, and you have to care for the 
> creation/destruction of Isolates explicitly. Magically creating a VM 
> instance before main() and relying on thread-local storage all over the 
> place is a constant source of bugs and confusion. Making the VM lifetime 
> explicit and having no notion of TLS in v8 will greatly simplify and 
> robustify things. This is how it should have been done in the first place, 
> but given the complexity of our code and the code of our embedders, the 
> transition is not easy and will take some time.
>
> Furthermore, we will try to make the platform dependencies (like threading 
> etc.) more explicit. You can already see the first steps towards that goal 
> in the Platform class in v8-platform.h, but there is definitely more to 
> come.
>
> A constantly changing API is not nice for embedders, that's clear, but we 
> have to improve things somehow. We try to keep the pain for embedders as 
> low as possible, but if you have any problems or questions regarding how to 
> update your code to work with the new API, feel free to ask on v8-users.
>  

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to