I understand that inline caching is helpful only when a particular accesses is repeatedly executed at the same location.
It does not consider the accesses made seperately. For example, for(i=0;i<1000;i++) obj.x; Here Inline caching will be helpful. But consider following obj.x; obj.x; .... 1000 times.. In this case, inline caching is not helpful because each access is made independently. Is that true? If this is the case, what is the point of patching inline caching stub at locations/accesses which will not be repeated. -- -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
